Leopoldina-Krankenhaus der Stadt Schweinfurt GmbH

Quality results

Treatment sector: Carotid artery narrowing: restoration of adequate blood flow through surgery (KAROTIS)

Designation Karotis-Revaskularisation
Shortcut 10/2
Number of cases 51
Documentation rate 100 %

Summary result:

In 6 of 7 quality characteristics, the quality objective was achieved.
No assessment is possible for one quality characteristic


Number of patients treated: 51

Quality objective achieved
Quality objective not achieved

The results in detail

Quality criterion
Hospital result
and target area
Quality objective
achieved?
All information
Ratio of the actual number to the previously expected number of patients who suffered a stroke or died during the operation (the individual risks of the patients were taken into account)
Hospital: 0,00
Target area: at most 2,79
Quality objective achieved
Ratio of the actual number to the previously expected number of patients who suffered a severe stroke or died after the operation (the individual risks of the patients were taken into account)
Hospital: 0,00
as rarely as possible
Evaluation is not available
So rarely has no specialist follow-up been carried out on patients with new neurological complaints
Hospital: Data protection

No information due to data protection

Target area: at most 5,00 %
Quality objective achieved
The intervention was appropriate for medical reasons (related to procedures performed with a tube (catheter)) for patients who had a carotid artery narrowed by at least 50% and no complaints
Hospital: Data protection

No information due to data protection

Target area: at least 95,00 %
Quality objective not achieved
There was a medically appropriate reason for the intervention (related to procedures performed by means of a tube (catheter)) for patients who had a carotid artery narrowed by at least 50% and complaints
Hospital: 100,00 %
Target area: at least 95,00 %
Quality objective achieved
Patients who had a carotid artery narrowed by at least 60% and no complaints and who suffered a stroke or died during the procedure (with reference to procedures performed by means of a tube (catheter) - patients in whom the carotid artery on the opposite side of the body was narrowed by more than 75% are not included)
Hospital: 0,00 %
as rarely as possible
Evaluation is not available
Patients who had a carotid artery narrowed by at least 60% and no complaints and who suffered a stroke or died during the operation and in whom the carotid artery on the opposite side of the body was narrowed by more than 75% (in relation to procedures performed using a tube (catheter))
Hospital: Data protection

No information due to data protection

as rarely as possible
Evaluation is not available
Patients who had a carotid artery narrowed by at least 50% and complaints and who suffered a stroke or died during the operation
Hospital: 0,00 %
as rarely as possible
Evaluation is not available
Patients who had a carotid artery narrowed by at least 50% and complaints and who suffered a stroke or died during the operation (related to procedures performed by means of a tube (catheter))
Hospital: 0,00 %
as rarely as possible
Evaluation is not available
Ratio of the actual number to the previously expected number of patients who suffered a severe stroke or died in connection with the procedure (related to procedures performed using a tube (catheter) - individual risks of the patients were taken into account)
Hospital: 0,00
as rarely as possible
Evaluation is not available
Ratio of the actual number to the previously expected number of patients who suffered a stroke or died during the procedure (based on procedures performed using a tube (catheter) - individual risks of the patients were taken into account)
Hospital: 0,00
Target area: at most 2,81
Quality objective achieved
Patients who had a carotid artery narrowed by at least 60% and no complaints suffered a stroke or died during the operation. During the operation the narrowed coronary vessel was bridged at the same time
Hospital: Data protection

No information due to data protection

Sentinel Event
Assessment not possible
The operation was appropriate for medical reasons for patients who had a carotid artery narrowed by at least 60% and no complaints
Hospital: 100,00 %
Target area: at least 95,00 %
Quality objective achieved
The operation was appropriate for medical reasons for patients who had a carotid artery narrowed by at least 50% and complaints
Hospital: 100,00 %
Target area: at least 95,00 %
Quality objective achieved
Patients who had a carotid artery narrowed by at least 60% and no complaints and who suffered a stroke or died during the operation (patients whose carotid artery on the opposite side of the body was narrowed by more than 75% are not considered)
Hospital: 0,00 %
as rarely as possible
Evaluation is not available
Patients who had a carotid artery narrowed by at least 60% and no complaints and who suffered a stroke or died during the operation and in whom the carotid artery on the opposite side of the body was narrowed by more than 75%
Hospital: Data protection

No information due to data protection

as rarely as possible
Evaluation is not available